The discontinuation of support for SketchUp Make 2017 also means no access to newer extensions via the Extension Warehouse. The omission of compatibility with newer formats like glTF and FBX may result in challenges when collaborating with other software and platforms. Users seeking sophisticated modeling functionalities may find this version inadequate.įurthermore, SketchUp Make 2017 exhibits limited file format support. The limitations include the lack of photorealistic rendering, complex curves and modeling tools, animation capabilities, and advanced texture options. This lack of ongoing support poses potential security risks and may compromise compatibility with future technologies.Īnother drawback is the absence of advanced features compared to newer versions and alternative software. Notably, official support for the software concluded in May 2022, signaling the end of security updates and bug fixes. Its simplicity and accessibility make it a suitable tool for those with uncomplicated modeling requirements.ĭespite its enduring appeal, SketchUp Make 2017 comes with notable weaknesses. This characteristic ensures accessibility for users with varied hardware capabilities.įor users with basic 3D modeling needs, such as creating furniture designs, floor plans, or basic architectural concepts, SketchUp Make 2017 provides sufficient functionality. In comparison to more resource-intensive 3D modeling software, this version runs smoothly on older and less powerful computers. Furthermore, a plethora of tutorials and online communities offer valuable learning resources and inspiration, enhancing the overall user experience.Īdditionally, the lightweight and efficient nature of SketchUp Make 2017 stands out. The extensive 3D Warehouse, housing millions of pre-made models, significantly expedites projects. The software's strengths extend to the availability of rich online resources. The user-friendly design contributes to its popularity among a diverse user base. This ease of use is a distinctive feature, enabling beginners with no prior 3D modeling experience to quickly learn and navigate the software. Moreover, SketchUp's interface, particularly its renowned push-pull functionality, remains simple and intuitive. The absence of financial constraints allows users to access core 3D modeling features without incurring any costs. The foremost advantage lies in its free and accessible nature, making it an attractive choice for hobbyists and casual users. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated too.SketchUp Make 2017 endures as a relevant tool for certain users despite its official retirement in 2022. I’m careful to use components, minimize the number of materials (usually ~30 per model) and keep the geometries clean, so I assume it’s simply the way the SU for Mac is built. It doesn’t sound like much, but over the course of a home model, it adds up. For example, clicking on a material to edit it takes a full few seconds to open. I’ve been using SU for 15+ years and think it’s great for what it is, but feel the way that it handles materials is especially ridiculous. My results on the Vray benchmark were right around the minute mark.Īside from Vray, SketchUP itself doesn’t seem to benefit as much from the iMac Pro as much as I’d expected either. I honestly don’t know the disadvantage of the GPU w/CPU option over the pure GPU option in terms of render times. I’ve also dealt with quite a few crashes (hanging or crashing), but that’s a different topic.įor rendering options I have CPU and GPU (w/C++), but I’d love to hear thoughts on various settings I should/can play around with. Admittedly I’m not blown away by the iMac, but I’m also not too familiar with Vray and its settings. I have a base model iMac Pro and have been playing around with a trial version of Vray 3.6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |